Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
This part has been superseded.
There may be limited quantities still available for purchase. Contact us for availability. Please contact your local service center for alternative options.
3M00051144767496

00051144767496

SUPERSEDED TO 3M_00051144766284, MTRL - 101415644
Item #104147613
3M00051144767496
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options

description

  • 3M™ Roloc™ Disc 777F features 3M-engineered high-performing ceramic abrasive grain blended with aluminum oxide for a combination of durability and cutting efficiency that increases productivity for both stock removal and finishing. The heavy, water-resistant polyester backing supports medium-pressure applications, a consistent cut-rate, and both wet and dry applications.

features

  • A blend of ceramic and aluminum oxide mineral self-sharpens and offers improved durability and cut-rate over aluminum oxide
  • 3M™ Roloc™ attachment system enables efficient and secure attachment and removal of the disc
  • Polyester backing is extremely tough to support medium-pressure applications while maintaining consistent performance in both wet and dry applications
  • Grinding aid reduces grinding temperatures for processes involving heat-sensitive alloys such as stainless steel, nickel alloys, and titanium
  • Heat-resistant resin coating bonds abrasive to backing for durability under pressure, heat, and water
Backing Material Polyester Cloth
Color Orange
Overall Diameter 1.5 in, 38.1 mm
Product Form Disc
Abrasive Material Ceramic
For Use On Stainless Steel, High Nickel Alloy
Backing Weight YF Weight
Grit 60
Coat Type Closed
RPM [Max] 30000 rpm
Attachment Type TS
Weight 0.007 LB
EAN or UPC 51144767496
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison