Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Series HO Axially Assembled Internal Retaining Ring

HO-43ST PA S

Series HO Axially Assembled Internal Retaining Ring
Item #101596278
  • Series HO
  • 0.438 in Housing Bore
  • 0.025 in Thick
  • Carbon Spring Steel
  • Phosphate Plating
  • Axially Assembled
  • Stacked
+ Show More + Show Less
Series HO Axially Assembled Internal Retaining Ring
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • Series HO
  • 0.438 in Housing Bore
  • 0.025 in Thick
  • Carbon Spring Steel
  • Phosphate Plating

description

  • Once installed in the groove of a housing/bore, the portion of the ring protruding from the groove (also called a “shoulder”) holds an assembly in place.

features

  • Axially assembled
  • Axially installed into machined grooves in housings/bores (internal) or on shafts (external)
  • Have lug holes for ease of installation/removal
  • Make uniform contact when released in a groove
  • Can accommodate higher thrust loadings
  • Provide more of a shoulder with which to retain a component or assembly than constant section or spiral retaining rings
Lug Height 0.098 in
Thrust Ring Safety Factor of 4 Pr Lb 1238 lbf
Tape Rings Stack 250
Length of Stack 6.25 in
Type Axially Assembled
Housing Diameter 0.438 in
Clearance Compressed in Housing 0.23 in
Hole Dia. 0.041 in
Thrust Groove Safety Factor of 2 Pg Lb 440 lbf
Thickness 0.025 in
Clearance Dia. Released In Groove 0.254 in
Tape Length of Stack 6.25 in
Series HO
Edge Margin 0.036 in
Package Type Stacked
Load Capacity [Max] 530 lbs
Tape Width 1 in
Plating Phosphate
Groove Depth 0.012 in
Inch/Metric Inch
Material Carbon Spring Steel
Gap Width Ring In Groove 0.063 in
Weight 0.025 LB
EAN or UPC 721717016824
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison