Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Series LC Radially Assembled External Interlocking Retaining Ring

LC-225ST PA

Series LC Radially Assembled External Interlocking Retaining Ring
Item #101554310
  • Series LC Radially Assembled Retaining Ring
  • 2.250 in Shaft Size
  • 0.078 in Thick
  • Carbon Steel
  • Phosphate Finish
  • Loose
+ Show More + Show Less
Series LC Radially Assembled External Interlocking Retaining Ring
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • Series LC Radially Assembled Retaining Ring
  • 2.250 in Shaft Size
  • 0.078 in Thick
  • Carbon Steel
  • Phosphate Finish

description

  • The LC ring is produced in two identical halves. The ends interlock into a groove on a shaft and, once assembled, are dynamically balanced. As a result, they are particularly effective at retaining assemblies with extremely high rotational speeds.

features

  • Radially installed into machined grooves on shafts (external)
  • Accommodate lower thrust loadings than axial retaining rings
  • Do not have lug holes: Easy to install using retaining ring applicators
  • Provide protruding “shoulders” for effective retention of assemblies
  • Economical alternative to Axially Assembled external tapered section rings
Thickness 0.078 in
Clearance Installed in Groove 2.65 in
Type Radially Assembled
Finish Phosphate
Section Height 0.262 in
Groove Depth 0.086 in
Series LC
Package Type Loose
Edge Margin 0.258 in
RPM Limit 13500 rpm
Limiting Speed 13500 rpm
Shaft Dia. 2.250 in
Load Capacity [Max] 3050 lbs
Material Carbon Steel
Thrust Ring Safety Factor of 3 Pr Lb 21112 lbf
Inch/Metric Inch
Plating Phosphate
Thrust Groove Safety Factor of 2 Pg Lb 10300 lbf
Weight 0.037 LB
EAN or UPC 721717116760
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison