Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Series PO/POL Radially Assembled External Poodle Retaining Ring

PO-100ST ZD

Series PO/POL Radially Assembled External Poodle Retaining Ring
Item #101554175
  • Series PO Radially Assembled Retaining Ring
  • 1.000 in Shaft Size
  • 0.078 in Thick
  • Carbon Steel
  • Zinc Dichromate Finish
  • Loose
+ Show More + Show Less
Series PO/POL Radially Assembled External Poodle Retaining Ring
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • Series PO Radially Assembled Retaining Ring
  • 1.000 in Shaft Size
  • 0.078 in Thick
  • Carbon Steel
  • Zinc Dichromate Finish

description

  • The PO ring features wide “ears” (resembling those of a poodle dog, thus the name) which offer extra retention surface against the retained part. PO rings also come in thinner sizes as a standard series of rings known as POL.

features

  • Radially installed into machined grooves on shafts (external)
  • Accommodate lower thrust loadings than axial retaining rings
  • Do not have lug holes: Easy to install using retaining ring applicators
  • Provide protruding “shoulders” for effective retention of assemblies
  • Economical alternative to Axially Assembled external tapered section rings
Package Type Loose
Clearance Installed in Groove 1.51 in
Limiting Speed 25000 rpm
Material Carbon Steel
Plating Zinc
Outside Dia. 1.415 in
Inch/Metric Inch
Thrust Groove Safety Factor of 2 Pg Lb 2600 lbf
Shaft Dia. 1.000 in
Tape Rings Stack 0
Type Radially Assembled
Thrust Ring Safety Factor of 2.5 Pr Lb 7613 lbf
Load Capacity [Max] 1800 lbs
Thickness 0.078 in
Series PO
Groove Depth 0.07 in
Finish Zinc Dichromate
RPM Limit 25000 rpm
Edge Margin 0.14 in
Weight 0.032 LB
EAN or UPC 721717011928
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison